[1].Ecological Niche Divergence between Trapelus ruderatus (Olivier, 1807) and T. persicus (Blanford, 1881) (Sauria: Agamidae) in the Middle East[J].Asian Herpetological Research,2016,7(2):96-102.[doi:10.16373/j.cnki.ahr.150032]
　Seyyed Saeed HOSSEINIAN YOUSEFKHANI,*,Omid MIRSHAMSI,et al.Ecological Niche Divergence between Trapelus ruderatus (Olivier, 1807) and T. persicus (Blanford, 1881) (Sauria: Agamidae) in the Middle East[J].Asian Herpetological Reserch(AHR),2016,7(2):96-102.[doi:10.16373/j.cnki.ahr.150032]
点击复制

Ecological Niche Divergence between Trapelus ruderatus (Olivier, 1807) and T. persicus (Blanford, 1881) (Sauria: Agamidae) in the Middle East()
分享到：

Asian Herpetological Research[ISSN:2095-0357/CN:51-1735/Q]

卷:
7
期数:
2016年2期
页码:
96-102
栏目:
出版日期:
2016-06-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Ecological Niche Divergence between Trapelus ruderatus (Olivier, 1807) and T. persicus (Blanford, 1881) (Sauria: Agamidae) in the Middle East
文章编号:
AHR-2015-0032
Author(s):
Seyyed Saeed HOSSEINIAN YOUSEFKHANI1; *;  Omid MIRSHAMSI1; 2;  Cetin ILGAZ3;  Yusuf KUMLUTAS3 and Aziz AVCI4
1 Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
2 Zoological Innovations Research Department, Institute of Applied Zoology, Faculty of Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
3 Dokuz Eylül University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, 35160, Buca, ?zmir, Turkey
4 Adnan Menderes University, Faculty of Science and Arts, Department of Biology, 09010, Ayd?n, Turkey
Keywords:
MaxEnt modeling;  habitat suitability;  niche differentiation;  Trapelus ruderatus;  Trapelus persicus;  Middle East
DOI:
10.16373/j.cnki.ahr.150032
Abstract:
Modeling the potential distribution areas for a given species is important in understanding the relationship between the actual distribution and the most suitable habitat for a species. In this study, we obtained all available records of Trapelus ruderatus and Trapelus persicus from museums, literature and fieldwork and used them with environmental layers in the Maximum Entropy algorithm to predict highly suitable habitat areas. The distribution model of T. ruderatus and T. persicus showed excellent performance for both models (T. ruderatus AUC = 0.964 ± 0.001 and T. persicus AUC = 0.996 ± 0.003), and predicted suitable regions in Iran, Turkey, Iraq and Syria. Niche overlap was measured between the two groups by ENMtools and 13% overlapped. We used a niche identity test to determine differences between the niches of the two species. Finally, by comparing our null hypothesis to the true niche overlap of the two species, we were able to reject our null hypothesis of no difference between the niches. Due to the sympatric distribution pattern of these species, we do not need a background test for niche divergence.

参考文献/References:

Ananjeva N. B., Golynsky E. A. 2013. Analysis of distribution of the Turkestan rock agama, Paralaudakia lehmanni (Nikolsky, 1896): Using of MAXENT modelling. Proc Zool Inst, 317(4): 426–437 (In Russian)
Ananjeva N. B., David P., Barabanov A., Dubois A. 2013. On the Type Specimens of Trapelus ruderatus (Olivier, 1804) and Some Nomenclatural Problems on Trapelus Cuvier, 1816 (Agamidae, Sauria). Russ J Herpetol, 20: 197–202
Ananjeva N. B., Golynsky E. A., Hosseinian Yousefkhani S. S., Masroor R. 2014. Distribution and Environmental Suitability of the Small-scaled Rock Agama, Paralaudakia microlepis (Sauria: Agamidae) in the Iranian Plateau. Asia Herpetol Res, 5: 161–167
Anderson S. C. 1999. The Lizards of Iran. Oxford (Ohio): Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles
Baran ?., Atatür M. K. 1998. Turkish Herpetofauna (Amphibians and Reptiles), ?evre Bakanl???, Ankara
Baran ?., Kasparek M., ?z M. 1989. On the distribution of four species of Agama (Agamidae) in Turkey. Zool Middle East, 3: 37–46
Baran ?., Ilgaz ?., Avc? A., Kumluta? Y., Olgun K. 2012. Türkiye Amfibive Sürüngenleri. T?B?TAK, Ankara. 204 p (ISBN: 978-975-403-703-6)
Ba?o?lu M., Hellmich W. 1970. Amphibien Anadolu und Reptilien aus dem Ostlichen. Ege ?niversitesi Fen Fakültesi?lmi RaporlarSerisi, ?zmir, 93: 1–26
Bernardes M., R?dder D., Nguyen T. T., Pham C. T., Nguyen T. Q., Ziegler T. 2013. Habitat characterization and potential distribution of Tylototriton vietna mensis in northern Vietnam. J Nat Hist, 47: 1161–1175
Bird C. G. 1936. The distribution of reptiles and amphibians in Asiatic Turkey, with notes on a collection from the vilayets of Adana, Gaziantep and Malatya. Ann Mag Nat Hist, 18: 257–281
Bodenheimer F. S. 1944. Introduction into the knowledge of the Amphibia and Reptilia of Turkey. Istanbul ?niversitesi Fen Fakültesi Mecmuas?, Seri B?9:?1–93
Doronin I. V. 2012. The use of GIS for the analysis of the distribution of rock lizards Darevskia (saxicola) complex (Sauria: Lacertidae). sSovrem Gerpeto, 12: 91–122 (In Russian)
Elith J., Phillips S., Hastie T., Dudík M., Chee Y. E., Yates C. 2011. A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Divers Distribut, 17: 43–57
Fathinia B., Rastegar-Pouyani N. 2011. Sexual dimorphism in Trapelus ruderatus ruderatus (Sauria: Agamidae) with notes on the natural history. Amph Rept Conserv, 5:15–22
Fattahi R., Ficetola G. F., Rastegar-Pouyani N., Avc? A., Kumluta? Y., Ilgaz ?., Hosseinian Yousefkhani S. S. 2014. Modelling the potential distribution of the Bridled Skink, Trachylepis vittata (Olivier, 1804), in the Middle East. Zool Middle East, 60: 1–9
Ficetola G. F., Bonardi A., Sindaco R., Padoa-Schioppa E. 2013. Estimating patterns of reptile biodiversity in remote regions. J Biogeogr, 40: 1202–1211
Frynta D., Moravec J., Ciháková J., Sádlo J., Hodková Z., Kaftan M., Kodym P., Král D., Pitule V., ?ejna L. 1997. Results of the Czech biological expedition to Iran. Part 1. Notes on the distribution of amphibians and reptiles. Acta Soc Zool Bohem, 61: 3–17
G??men B., Nilson G., Yildiz M. Z., Arikan H., Yal?inkaya D., Akman B. 2007. On the occurrence of the Black Cat Snake, Telescopus nigriceps (Ahl, 1924) (Serpentes: Colubridae) from the Southeastern Anatolia, Turkey with some taxonomical comments. North-West J Zool, 3: 81–95
G??men B., Franzen M., Yildiz M. Z., Akman B., Yal?inkaya D. 2009. New locality records of eremial snake species in southeastern Turkey (Ophidia: Colubridae, Elapidae, Typhlopidae, Leptotyphlopidae). Salamandra, 45: 110–114
Graham C. H., Ron S. R., Santos J. C., Schneider C. J., Moritz C. 2004. Integrating phylogenetics and environmental niche models to explore speciation mechanisms in dendrobatid frogs. Evolution, 58: 1781–1793
Guisan A., Zimmermann N. E. 2000. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol Model, 135:147–186
Hosseinian Yousefkhani S. S., Ficetola G. F., Rastegar-Pouyani N., Ananjeva N. B., Rastegar-Pouyani E., Masroor R. 2013. Environmental suitability for the Caucasian rock agama, Paralaudakia caucasia (Sauria: Agamidae) in Western and Central Asia. Asia Herpetol Res, 4(3): 207–213
Litvinchuk S. N., Kazakov V. I., Pasynkova R. A., Borkin L. J., Kuranova V. N., Rosanov J. M. 2010. Tetraploid Green Toad species (Bufo pewzowi) from the Altay Mountains: The first record for Russia. Russ J Herpetol, 17(4): 290–298
Hugall A., Moritz C., Moussalli A., Stanisic J. 2002. Reconciling paleodistribution models and comparative phylogeography in the wet tropics rainforest land snail Gnarosophia bellendenkerensis (Brazier 1875). PNAS, 99: 6112–6117
Kolanowska M. 2013. Niche conservatism and the future potential range of Epipactis helleborine (Orchidaceae). PLoS ONE, 8: e77352. doi:10.1371/ journal.pone.0077352
MacArthur R. 1972. Geographical Ecology: Patterns in the Distribution of Species. New York: Harper and Row
Mu?oz M. E. S., Giovanni R., Siqueira M. F., Sutton T., Brewer P., Pereira R. S., Canhos D. A. L., Canhos V. P. 2011. OpenModeller: a generic approach to species’ potential distribution modeling. GeoInformatica, 15: 111–135
Peterson A. T., Vieglais D. A. 2001. Predicting species invasions using ecological niche modeling: New approaches from bioinformatics attack a pressing problem: A new approach to ecological niche modeling, based on new tools drawn from biodiversity informatics, is applied to the challenge of predicting potential species’ invasions. BioScience,?51: 363–371
Phillips S. J., Dudík M., Schapire R. E. 2004. A maximum entropy approach to species distribution modeling. In Proceedings of the twenty-first international conference on Machine learning. ACM, 83 pp
Phillips S. J., Anderson R. P., Schapire R. E. 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model, 190: 231–259
Raes N., terSteege, H. 2007. A null model for significance testing of presence only species distribution models. Ecography,?30: 727–736
Rastegar-Pouyani N. 2000. Taxonomic status of Trapelus ruderatus (Olivier) and T. persicus (Blanford), and validity of T. lessonae (De Filippi). Amphibia-Reptilia, 21: 91–102
Renner I. W., Warton D. I. 2013. Equivalence of MAXENT and Poisson point process models for species distribution modeling in ecology. Biometrics, 69: 274–281
?míd J., Moravec J., Kodym P., Kratochvíl L., Hosseinian Yousefkhani S. S., Rastegar-Pouyani E., Frynta D. 2014. Annotated checklist and distribution of the lizards of Iran. Zootaxa, 3855: 1– 97
Warren D. L., Glor R. E., Turelli M. 2008. Environmental niche equivalency versus conservatism: quantitative approaches to niche evolution. Evolution, 62: 2868–2883
Warren D. L., Glor R. E., Turelli M. 2010. ENMTools: a toolbox for comparative studies of environmental niche models. Ecography, 33: 607–611

更新日期/Last Update: 2016-06-25