参考文献/References:
Abouheif E., Fairbairn D. J. 1997. A comparative analysis of allometry for sexual size dimorphism: Assessing Rensch’s rule. Am Nat, 149(3): 540–562
Andersson M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton, New Jersey, USA: Princeton University Press
Berry J. F., Shine R. 1980. Sexual dimorphism and sexual selection in turtles (order Testudines). Oecologia, 44(2): 185–191
Blanckenhorn W. U. 2005. Behavioral causes and consequences of sexual size dimorphism. Ethology, 111(11): 977–1016
Bolnick D. I., Doebeli M. 2003. Sexual dimorphism and sympatric speciation: Two sides of the same ecological coin. Evolution, 57(11): 2433–2449
Butler M. A., Sawyer S. M., Losos J. B. 2007. Sexual dimorphism and adaptive radiation in Anolis lizards. Nature, 447(7141): 202–205
Butler M. A., Schoener T. W., Losos J. B. 2000. The relationship between sexual size dimorphism and habitat use in Greater Antillean Anolis lizards. Evolution, 54(1): 259–272
Cameron M. H., He X., Fu J. 2011. Keratinized nuptial spines are used for male combat in the Emei moustache toad (Leptobrachium boringii). Asian Herpetol Res, 2(3): 142–148
Clutton-Brock T. H. 1982. The functions of antlers. Behaviour, 79(2): 108–125
Cox R. M., Skelly S. L., John-Alder H. B. 2003. A comparative test of adaptive hypotheses for sexual size dimorphism in lizards. Evolution, 57(7): 1653–1669
Crook J. H. 1972. Sexual selection, dimorphism, and social organization in the primates. In Campbell R. (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man. Chicago, IL, USA: Aldine, 231–281
Darwin C. 1871. The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London, UK: John Murray
Emlen S. T., Oring L. W. 1977. Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science, 197(4300): 215–223
Fairbairn D. J. 1997. Allometry for sexual size dimorphism: pattern and process in the coevolution of body size in males and females. Annu Rev Ecol Syst, 28: 659–687
Fairbairn D. J., Blanckenhorn W. U., Szekely T. 2007. Sex, size, and gender roles: Evolutionary studies of sexual size dimorphism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
Fairbairn D. J., Preziosi R. F. 1994. Sexual selection and the evolution of allometry for sexual size dimorphism in the water strider, Aquarius remigis. Am Nat, 144(1): 101–118
Fairbairn D. J., Shine R. 1993. Patterns of sexual size dimorphism in seabirds of the southern hemisphere. Oikos, 68(1): 139–145
Han X., Fu J. 2013. Dose life history shape sexual size dimorphism in anurans? A comparative analysis. BMC Evol Biol, 13(1): 27
Herrel A., Spithoven L., Van Damme R., De Vree F. 1999. Sexual dimorphism of head size in Gallotia galloti: Testing the niche divergence hypothesis by functional analyses. Funct Ecol, 13(3): 289–297
Hudson C. M., Fu J. 2013. Male-biased sexual size dimorphism, resource defense polygyny, and multiple paternity in the Emei moustache toad (Leptobrachium boringii). PLoS ONE, 8(6): e67502
Hudson C. M., He X., Fu J. 2011. Keratinized nuptial spines are used for male combat in the Emei moustache toad (Leptobrachium boringii). Asian Herpetol Res, 2(3): 142–148
Johnstone R. A., Reynolds J. D., Deutsch J. C. 1996. Mutual mate choice and sex differences in choosiness. Evolution, 50(4): 1382–1391
Katsikaros K., Shine R. 1997. Sexual dimorphism in the tusked frog, Adelotus brevis (Anura: Myobatrachidae): The roles of natural and sexual selection. Biol J Linn Soc, 60(1): 39–51
Kluge A. G. 1981. The life history, social organization, and parental behaviour of Hylarosenbergi Boulenger, a nest-building gladiator frog. Misc Publ Mus Zool Univ Mich, 160(1): 1–170
Liu C., Hu S. 1961. Tailless amphibians of China. Beijing, China: Science Press
McDiarmid R. W. 1978. The evolution of parental care in frogs. In Burghardt G. M., Bekoff M. (Eds.), The development of behavior: comparative and evolutionary aspects. Enfield, UK: Science Publisher, 127–147
Monnet J. M., Cherry M. I. 2002. Sexual size dimorphism in anurans. P Roy Soc B: Biol Sci, 269(1507): 2301–2307
Moore S. L., Wilson K. 2002. Parasites as a viability cost of sexual selection in natural populations of mammals. Science, 297(5589): 2015–2018
Nie Y., Swaisgood R. R., Zhang Z., Hu Y., Ma Y., Wei F. 2012. Giant panda scent-marking strategies in the wild: Role of season, sex and marking surface. Anim Behav, 84(1): 39–44
Parker G. A. 1992. The evolution of sexual size dimorphism in fish. J Fish Biol, 41(sB): 1–20
Preest M. R. 1994. Sexual size dimorphism and feeding energetics in the lizard Anolis carolinensis: Why do female take smaller prey then males? J Herpetol, 28(3): 292–298
Rao D., Wilkinson J. A. 2008. Phylogenetic relationships of the mustache toads inferred from mtDNA sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol, 46(1): 61–73
Reading C. J. 2001. Non-random pairing with respect to past breeding experience in the common toad (Bufo bufo). J Zool, 255(4): 511–518
Selander R. K. 1972. Sexual selection and dimorphism in birds. In Campbell B. (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man. Chicago, IL, USA: Aldine, 180–230
Semlitsch R. D. 1994. Evolutionary consequences of non-random mating: Do large males increase offspring fitness in the anuran Bufo bufo. Behav Ecol Sociobiol, 34(1): 19–24
Schauble C. S. 2004. Variation in body size and sexual dimorphism across geographical and environmental space in the frogs Limnodynastes tasmaniensis and L. peronii. Biol J Linn Soc, 82(1): 39–56
Shine R. 1979. Sexual selection and sexual dimorphism in the Amphibia. Copeia, 1979(2): 297–306
Shine R. 1991. Intersexual dietary divergence and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in snakes. Am Nat, 138(1): 103–122
Short R. V., Balaban E. 1994. The differences between sexes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
Smith D. C. 1987. Adult recruitment in chorus frogs: Effects of size and date at metamorphosis. Ecology, 68(2): 344–350
Temeles E. J. 1985. Sexual size dimorphism of bird-eating hawks: The effect of prey vulnerability. Am Nat, 125(4): 485–499
Trivers R. L. 1971. Parental investment and sexual selection. In Campbll B. (Ed.). Sexual selection and the descent of man. Chicago, IL, USA: Aldine, 1871–1971
Tsuji H., Matsui M. 2002. Male-male combat and head morphology in a fanged frog (Rana kuhlii) from Taiwan. J Herpetol, 36(3): 520–526
Weatherhead P. J. 1980. Sexual dimorphism in two savannah sparrow populations. Can J Zool, 58(3): 412–415
Wells K.D. 2007. The ecology and behavior of amphibians. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press
Wiklund C., Karlsson B. 1988. Sexual size dimorphism in relationto fecundity in some Swedish Satyrid butterflies. Am Nat, 131(1): 132–138
Zhang W., Luo Z., Zhao M., Wu H. 2015. High genetic diversity in the endangered and narrowly distributed amphibian species Leptobrachium leishanensis. Integr Zool, 10(5): 465–481
Zheng Y., Deng D., Li S., Fu J. 2010. Aspects of the breeding biology of the Omei mustache toad (Leptobrachium boringii): Polygamy and paternal care. Amphibia-Reptilia, 31(2): 183–194
Zheng Y., Li S., Fu J. 2008. A phylogenetic analysis of frog genera Vibrissaphora and Leptobrachium and the correlated evolution of nuptial spine and reversed sexual size dimorphism. Mol Phylogenet Evol, 46(2): 695–707