[1].[J].Asian Herpetological Research,2013,4(2):134-139.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1245.2013.00134]
 Daode YANG*,Sikan CHEN,Yuanhui CHEN and Yuying YAN.Using Head Patch Pattern as a Reliable Biometric Character for Noninvasive Individual Recognition of an Endangered Pitviper Protobothrops mangshanensis[J].Asian Herpetological Research(AHR),2013,4(2):134-139.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1245.2013.00134]


Asian Herpetological Research[ISSN:2095-0357/CN:51-1735/Q]

Original Article


Using Head Patch Pattern as a Reliable Biometric Character for Noninvasive Individual Recognition of an Endangered Pitviper Protobothrops mangshanensis
Daode YANG1* Sikan CHEN1 Yuanhui CHEN2 and Yuying YAN1
1 Institute of Wildlife Conservation, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, Hunan, China
2 Hunan Mangshan National Nature Reserve Administration, Yizhang 424221, Hunan, China
biometric identification endangered snake head patch pattern Mangshan pitviper noninvasive individual recognition image?analysis natural markings
Mangshan pitviper, Protobothrops mangshanensis (formerly Zhaoermia mangshanensis) is endemic to China. Unfortunately, due to the decreasing size of its wild populations, this snake has been listed as critically endangered. Research carried out on the Mangshan pitviper’s population ecology and captive reproduction has revealed that the unique head patch patterns of different individuals may potentially be used as a noninvasive recognition biometric character. We collected head patch pattern images of 40 individuals of P. mangshanensis between 1994 and 2011. By comparing each pitviper’s head patch pattern, we found that the head patch pattern of individual snakes was different and unique. Additionally, we observed and recorded the head patch pattern characters of four adults and five juveniles before and after ecdysis. Our findings confirmed that head patch patterns of Mangshan pitvipers are unique and stable, remaining unchanged after ecdysis. Thus, individuals can be quickly identified by examining the head patch pattern within a specific recognition area on the head. This method may be useful for noninvasive individual recognition in many other species that display color patch pattern variations, especially in studies of endangered species where the use of invasive marking techniques is undesirable.


Angelini C., Costa C., Raimondi S. Menesatti P., Utzeri C. 2010. Image analysis of the ventral colour pattern discriminates between spectacled salamanders, Salamandrina perspicillata and S. terdigitata (Amphibia, Salamandridae). Amphibia-Reptilia, 31: 273–282
Blanchard F. N., Finster E. B. 1933. A method of marking living snakes for future recognition, with a discussion of some problems and results. Ecology, 14: 334–347
Bradfield K. S. 2004. Photographic identification of individual Archey’s frogs, Leiopelma archeyi, from natural markings. Wellington, NZ: NZ Department of Conservation
Brown W. S., Parker W. S. 1976. A ventral scale clipping system for permanently marking snakes. J Herpetol, 10: 247–249
Clark D. R. Jnr. 1971. Branding as a marking technique for amphibians and reptiles. Copeia, 1971: 148–151
Costa C., Angelini C., Scardi M., Menesatti P., Utzeri C. 2009. Using image analysis on the ventral colour pattern in Salamandrina perspicillata (Savi, 1821) (Amphibia,?Salamandridae) to discriminate among populations. Biol?J Linn Soc,?96:?35–43
Elbin S. B., Burger J. 1994. In my experience: Implantable microchips for individual identification in wild and captive populations. Wildl Soc Bull, 22: 677–683
Fei L., Ye C.Y., Jiang J. P. 2010. Colored Atlas of Chinese Amphibians. Chengdu, China: Sichuan Publishing House of Science and Technology
Gamble L., Ravela S., McGarigal K. 2008. Multi-scale features for identifying individuals in large biological databases: An application of pattern recognition technology to the marbled salamander Ambystoma opacum. J?Appl?Ecol,?45:?170–180
Gallardo-Escárate C., Goldstein-Vasquez J., Thiel M. 2007. Individual identification of decapod crustaceans I: Color patterns in rock shrimp (Rhynchocinetes typus). J Crustacean Biol, 27: 393–398
Gong S. P., Yang D. D., Chen Y. H., Lau M., Wang F. M. 2013. Population status, distribution and conservation needs of the endangered Protobothrops mangshanensis of China. Oryx, 47: 122–127
Gumprecht A., Tillack F. 2004. Proposal for a replacement name of the snake genus Ermia Zhang, 1993. Rus J Herpetol, 11: 73–76
Guo P., Malhotra A., Li P. P., Pook C. E., Creer S. 2007. New evidence on the phylogenetic position of the poorly known Asian pitviper Protobothrops kaulbacki (Serpentes: Viperidae: Crotalinae) with a redescription of the species and a revision of the genus Protobothrops. Herpetol J, 17: 237–246
Hirth H. F. 1966. Weight changes and mortality of three species of snakes during hibernation. Herpetologica, 22: 8–12
Hoque S., Azhar M. A. H. B., Deravi F. 2011. ZOOMETRICS – Biometric identification of wildlife using natural body marks. Inter J Bio-Sci Bio-Tech, 3: 45–54
Jain A. K., Ross A., Prabhakar S. 2004. An introduction to biometric recognition. IEEE T Circ Syst Vid, 14: 4–20
Katona S. K., Whitehead H. P. 1981. Identifying humpback whales using their natural markings. Polar Rec, 20: 439–444
Kelly M. J., Laurenson M. K., Fitzgibbon C. D., Collins D. A., Durant S. M., Frame G. W., Bertram B. C., Caro T. M. 1998. Demography of the Serengeti cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) population: The first 25 years. J Zool, 244: 473–488
Lewke R. E., Stroud R. K. 1974. Freeze-branding as a method of marking snakes. Copeia, 1974: 997–1000
Moon B. R., Ivanyi C. S., Johnson J. 2004. Identifying individual rattlesnakes using tail pattern variation. Herpetol Rev, 35: 154–156
Neuhaus P., Ruckstuhl K. E. 2002. The link between sexual dimorphism, activity budgets, and group cohesion: The case of the Plains Zebra (Equus burchelli). Can J Zool, 80: 1437–1441
Ojala T., Pietik?inen M., Harwood D. 1996. A comparative study of texture measures with classification based on featured distributions. Patt Recogn, 29: 51–59
Orlov N. L., Ryabov S. A., Nguyen T. T. 2009. Two new species of genera Protobothrops Hoge et Romano-Hoge, 1983 and Viridovipera Malhotra et Thorpe, 2004 (Ophidia: Viperidae: Crotalinae) from Karst Region in Northeastern Vietnam. Part I. Description of a new species of Protobothrops genus. Rus J Herpetol, 16: 69–82
Pough F. H. 1970. A quick method for permanently marking snakes and turtles. Herpetologica, 26: 428–430
Pendlebury G. B. 1972. Tagging and remote identification of rattlesnakes. Herpetologica, 28: 349–350
Permuter H., Francos J., Jermyn I. 2006. A study of Gaussian mixture models of color and texture features for image classification and segmentation. Patt Recogn, 39: 695–706
Pollard K. A., Blumstein D. T., Griffin S. C. 2010. Pre-screening acoustic and other natural signatures for use in noninvasive individual identification. J Appl Ecol,http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpe.2010.47.issue-5/issuetoc 47: 1103–1109
Rodda G. H., Bock B. C., Burghardt G. M., Rand A. S. 1988. Techniques for identifying individual lizards at a distance reveal influences of handling. Copeia, 1988: 905–913
Shine C., Shine N., Shine R., Slip D. 1988. Use of subcaudal scale anomalies as an aid in recognizing individual snakes. Herpetol Rev, 19: 79
Spellerberg I. F. 1977. Marking live snakes for identification of individuals in population studies. J Appl Ecol, 14: 137–138
Wang Z. X. 2011. Making an ID card for the Chinese crocodile lizard Shinisaurus crocodilurus. Life World, 12: 50–51 (In Chinese)
Zhao E. M., Chen Y. H. 1990. Description of a new species of the genus Trimeresurus. Sichuan J Zool, 9: 11–12 (In Chinese)

更新日期/Last Update: 2016-01-25