[1].Effect of Female Reproduction and Mate Choice on Sexual Size Dimorphism in the Northeast Treefrog Hyla ussuriensis (Anura: Hylidae) in China[J].Asian Herpetological Research,2012,3(4):273-279.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1245.2012.00273]
 Peng LIU,Zhiying ZHANG,Shuai ZHAO and Wenge ZHAO*.Effect of Female Reproduction and Mate Choice on Sexual Size Dimorphism in the Northeast Treefrog Hyla ussuriensis (Anura: Hylidae) in China[J].Asian Herpetological Research(AHR),2012,3(4):273-279.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1245.2012.00273]

Effect of Female Reproduction and Mate Choice on Sexual Size Dimorphism in the Northeast Treefrog Hyla ussuriensis (Anura: Hylidae) in China()

Asian Herpetological Research[ISSN:2095-0357/CN:51-1735/Q]

Original Article


Effect of Female Reproduction and Mate Choice on Sexual Size Dimorphism in the Northeast Treefrog Hyla ussuriensis (Anura: Hylidae) in China
Peng LIU Zhiying ZHANG Shuai ZHAO and Wenge ZHAO*
College of Life Sciences and Technology, Harbin Normal University, Harbin 150025, Heilongjiang, China
Hyla ussuriensis morphology mating pattern fecundity selection sexual selection
Sexual size dimorphism (SSD) plays a significant role in understanding the evolution of life history and mating behavior. In this study, we analyzed the morphological data from a treefrog, Hyla ussuriensis, in northeastern China and found that there are significant differences between males and females. Females that are larger in body size increase fecundity as the total number of eggs is positively correlated to female body size. Males are smaller in body size due to the mate choice by females based on the size dimorphism index (SVL mean of female divided by that of male) for the population, which may be an evolutionary stable strategy (ESS). SSD can be influenced not only through mate choice, but also reproductive behavior by analyzing the female reproduction output in the field. Our data are consistent with many previous studies, indicating that fecundity selection and sexual selection may be the common cause for sexual dimorphism in this species. Furthermore, there are no significant morphological differences between mated and unmated frogs of both sexes, which suggests that any frog can obtain a breeding chance when it matures. It further indicates that males may not affect female choice except by their snout-vent length (SVL) and body mass. It is, of course, possible that females adopt a mating strategy to mate with males whose SVL and body mass are smaller than paired females. Our research provides unequivocal evidence for effective female choice and information on the evolution of SSD in the production of anuran pairing patterns.


Andrews R. M., Stamps J. A. 1994. Temporal variation in sexual size dimorphism of Anolis limifrons in Panama. Copeia, 1994: 613–622
Arak A. 1988. Sexual dimorphism in body size: A model and a test. Evolution, 42: 820–825
Berven K. A. 1981. Mate choice in the wood frog, Rana sylvatica. Evolution, 35: 707–722
Buchanan B. W. 1994. Sexual dimorphism in Hyla squirella: Chromatic and pattern variation between the sexes. Copeia, 1994: 797–802
Crump M. L., Townsend D. S. 1990. Random mating by size in a neotropical tree frog, Hyla pseudopuma. Herpetologica, 46: 383–386
Davies N. B., Halliday T. R. 1977. Optimal mate selection in the toad Bufo bufo. Nature, 269: 56–58
Doty G. V., Welch A. M. 2001. Advertisement call duration indicates good genes for offspring feeding rate in gray tree frogs (Hyla versicolor). Behav Ecol Sociobiol, 49: 150–156
Fei L., Hu S. Q., Ye C. Y., Huang Y. Z. 2009. Fauna Sinica: Amphibia: Vol. 2: Anura. Beijing, China: Science Press, 600–605 (In Chinese)
Fellers G. M. 1979. Mate selection in the gray treefrog Hyla versicolor. Copeia, 1979: 286–290
Forester D. C., Czarnowsky R. 1985. Sexual selection in the spring peeper, Hyla crucifer (Amphibia, Anura): Role of the advertisement call. Behaviour, 92: 112–128
Friedl T. W. P., Klump G. M. 2005. Sexual selection in the lek-breeding European treefrog: Body size, chorus attendance, random mating and good genes. Anim Behav, 70: 1141–1154
Gerhardt H. C. 1987. Evolutionary and neurobiological implications of selective phonotaxis in the green tree frog, Hyla cinerea. Anim Behav, 35: 1479–1489
Gerhardt H. C. 1994. Reproductive character displacement of female mate choice in the grey treefrog, Hyla chrysoscelis. Anim Behav, 47: 959–969
Gibbons M. M., McCarthy T. K. 1986. The reproductive output of frogs Rana temporaria (L.) with particular reference to body size and age. J Zool, 209: 579–593
Gutiérrez G., Lüddecke H. 2002. Mating pattern and hatching success in a population of the Andean frog Hyla labialis. Amphibia-Reptilia, 23: 281–292
Halliday T. R. 1983. Do frogs and toads choose their mates? Nature, 306: 226–227
Hirai T., Matsui M. 2000. Feeding habits of the Japanese tree frog, Hyla japonica, in the reproductive season. Zool Sci, 17: 977–982
Hirai T., Matsui M. 2001. Food habits of an endangered Japanese frog, Rana porosa brevipoda. Ecol Res, 16: 737–743
H?bel G., Gerhardt H. C. 2003. Reproductive character displacement in the acoustic communication system of green tree frogs (Hyla cinerea). Evolution, 57: 894–904
Howard R. D. 1981. Sexual dimorphism in bullfrog. Ecology, 62: 303–310
Howard R. D., Kluge A. G. 1985. Proximate methods of sexual selection in wood frogs. Evolution, 39: 269–277
Katsikaros K., Shine R. 1997. Sexual dimorphism in the tusked frog, Adelotus brevis (Anura: Myobatrachidae): The roles of natural and sexual selection. Biol J Linn Soc, 60: 39–51
Kupfer A. 2007. Sexual size dimorphism in amphibians: An overview. In Fairbairn D. J., Blanckenhorn W. U., Sze-kely T. (Eds.), Sex, size and gender roles: Evolutionary studies of sexual size dimorphism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 50–59
Lee J. C., Crump M. L. 1981. Morphological correlates of male mating success in Triprion petasatus and Hyla marmorata (Anura: Hylidae). Oecologia (Berl.), 50: 153–157
Lemckert F. L., Shine R. 1993. Costs of reproduction in a population of the frog Crinia signifera (Anura: Myobatrachidae) from Southeastern Australia. J Herpetol, 27: 420–425
Liao W. B., Lu X. 2009. Male mate choice in the Andrew’s toad Bufo andrewsi: A preference for larger females. Ethology, 27: 413–417
Liao W. B., Lu X. 2010. Age structure and body size of the Chuanxi Tree Frog Hyla annectans chuanxiensis from two different elevations in Sichuan (China). Zool Anz, 248: 255–263
Liao W. B., Lu X. 2011a. Proximate mechanisms leading to large male-mating advantage in the Andrew’s toad Bufo andrewsi. Behaviour, 148: 1087–1102
Liao W. B., Lu X. 2011b. Male mating success in the Omei treefrog (Rhacophorus omeimontis): The influence of body size and age. Belg J Zool, 141: 3–12
Liao W. B., Lu X. 2012. Variation in mating patterns in the Andrew’s toad Bufo andrewsi along an elevational gradient in southwestern China. Ethol Ecol Evol (In press), DOI: 10.1080/03949370.2011.624552
Liao W. B., Wu Q. G., Barrett K. 2012. Evolution of sexual dimorphism in forelimb muscles of the Andrew’s toad Bufo andrewsi in response to sexual selection. Anim Biol, 62: 83–93
Lüddecke H. 2001. Variation in mating patterns in a population of the Andean frog Hyla labialis. Amphibia-Reptilia, 22: 199–207
Ma X., Lu X. 2009. Sexual size dimorphism in relation to age and growth based on skeletochronological analysis in a Tibetan frog. Amphibia-Reptilia, 30: 351–359
Macnally R. C. 1981. On the reproductive energetics of chorusing males: Energy depletion profiles, restoration and growth in two sympatric species of Ranidella (Anura). Oecologia, 51: 181–188
Marquez R, Tejedo M. 1990. Size-based mating pattern in the tree frog Hyla arborea. Herpetologica, 46: 176–182
Morris M. B. 1989. Female choice of large males in the treefrog Hyla chrysoscelis: The importance of identifying the scale of choice. Behav Ecol Sociobiol, 25: 275–281
Nunes I., Sampaio R. S., Junca F. A. 2007. Advertisement calls of four Hylid frogs from the state of Bahia, Northeastern Brazil (Amphibia, Anura, Hylidae). S Am J Herpetol, 2: 89–96
Pr?hl H. 2003. Variation in male calling behavior and relation to male mating success in the strawberry poison frog (Dendrobates pumilio). Ethology, 109: 273–290
Robertson J. G. M. 1986. Female choice, male strategies and the role of vocalizations in Australian frog Uperoleia rugosa. Anim Behav, 34: 773–784
Schwartz J. J., Buchanan B. W., Gerhardt H. C. 2001. Female mate choice in the gray tree frog (Hyla versicolor) in three experimental environments. Behav Ecol Sociobiol, 49: 443–455
Searcy W. A., Andersson M. 1986. Sexual selection and the evolution of song. Annu Rev Ecol Syst, 17: 507–533
Shi L. Q., Zhang X. Q., Ma X. M. 2011. Ontogeny in sexual dimorphism and female reproduction of rice frog Fejervarya limnocharis. Chin J Ecol, 30: 717–723 (In Chinese)
Shine R. 1979. Sexual selection and sexual dimorphism in the Amphibia. Copeia, 1979: 297–306
Shine R., O’connor D., Lemaster M. P., Mason R. T. 2001. Pick on someone your own size: Ontogenetic shifts in mate choice by male garter snakes result in size-assortative mating. Anim Behav, 61: 1133–1141
Shou L, Du W. G., Shu L. 2005. Sexual dimorphism and fecundity in the gold-stripe pond frog (Pelophylax plancyi) and the terrestrial frog (Fejervarya limnocharis). Acta Ecol Sin, 25: 664–668 (In Chinese)
Sullivan B. K. 1983. Sexual selection in Woodhouse’s toad (Bufo woodhousei) II. Female choice. Anim Behav, 31: 1011–1017
Sullivan B. K., Hinshaw S. H. 1992. Female choice and selection on male calling behaviour in the grey treefrog Hyla uersicolor. Anim Behav, 44: 733–744
Sullivan B. K., Ryan M. J., Verrell P. A. 1995. Female choice and mating system structure. In Heatwole H., Sullivan B. K. (Eds.), Amphibian Biology, Vol. 2, Social Behaviour. Surrey Beatty: Chipping Norton, 469–517
Thomas W. P. F., Georg M. K. 2005. Sexual selection in the lek-breeding European treefrog: Body size, chorus attendance, random mating and good genes. Anim Behav, 70: 1141–1154
Vargas-Salinas F. 2006. Sexual size dimorphism in the Cuban treefrog Osteopilus septentrionalis. Amphibia-Reptilia, 27: 419–426
Wei L., Lin Z. H., Ma X. M., Zhao L. H., Ma X. H. 2011. Acoustic characteristics of the tiger frog, Hoplobatrachus rugulosus, during the breeding season. Zool Res, 32: 456–460
Wells K. D. 1977. Territoriality and male mating success in the green frog (Rana clamitans). Ecology, 58: 750–762
Wells K. D. 2007. The ecology and behavior of amphibians. Chicago: Chicago University Press
Wells K. D., Schwartz J. J. 1984. Vocal communication in a neotropical treefrog, Hyla ebraccata: Advertisement calls. Anim Behav, 32: 405–420
Whitney C. L., Krebs J. R. 1975. Mate selection in Pacific tree frogs. Nature, 255: 325–326
Woolbright L. L. 1983. Sexual selection and size dimorphism in anuran amphibia. Am Nat, 121: 110–119
Zhao W. G., Liu P., Chen H. 2008. The Amphibia and Reptilia Fauna of Heilongjiang. Beijing, China: Science Press, 61–73 (In Chinese)

更新日期/Last Update: 2016-03-15