[1].Effect of Check Dams on Amphibian Assemblages along Ephemeral Streams in a Tropical Deciduous Forest in Thailand[J].Asian Herpetological Research,2012,3(3):175-183.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1245.2012.00175]
 Ratchata PHOCHAYAVANICH,Wichase KHONSUE and Noppadon KITANA*.Effect of Check Dams on Amphibian Assemblages along Ephemeral Streams in a Tropical Deciduous Forest in Thailand[J].Asian Herpetological Research(AHR),2012,3(3):175-183.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1245.2012.00175]

Effect of Check Dams on Amphibian Assemblages along Ephemeral Streams in a Tropical Deciduous Forest in Thailand()

Asian Herpetological Research[ISSN:2095-0357/CN:51-1735/Q]

Original Article


Effect of Check Dams on Amphibian Assemblages along Ephemeral Streams in a Tropical Deciduous Forest in Thailand
Ratchata PHOCHAYAVANICH1 2 Wichase KHONSUE2 and Noppadon KITANA2*
1 Biological Science Program, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Pathumwan, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
2 Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Pathumwan, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
moisture temporary stream species diversity species composition
Numerous check dams have been constructed in many countries, but there continues to be very limited scientific evidence of their effect on biotic community. Since amphibians are highly sensitive to moisture changes, amphibian assemblages were used as a monitoring parameter to evaluate the effects of check dams on biotic components in this study. Comparison of amphibian assemblages between check dam and non-check dam areas was conducted along ephemeral streams in a tropical deciduous forest of the Chulalongkorn University Forest and Research Station in Nan Province, Thailand from April 2009 to March 2010. Five transects, including the stream transect, and 5, 10, 25, and 50 m terrestrial transects, were used for amphibian surveys between the two areas. Physical factors related to moisture were also compared between these areas. It was found that hydroperiod in the check dam stream was significantly higher than that in the non-check dam stream. Soil moisture content at most terrestrial transects in the check dam area was significantly higher than that in the non-check dam area, while similarity in leaf litter moisture content was found in most transects. Simpson’s index of diversity indicated that amphibian diversities in all transects were equally diverse between the two areas in both wet and dry seasons. Cluster analysis of similarity in species composition indicated that amphibian composition in the check dam stream was distinct from that in the non-check dam stream in the wet season or the functional period of the check dam. However, the amphibian compositions in both check dam and non-check dam streams were similar to each other in the dry season. No significant check dam effect was found on species composition in the terrestrial habitats in both seasons. Overall, using a highly moisture-sensitive vertebrate as a bio-indicator, the results showed that the check dams and the changes in moisture-related physical factors appear to have little short-term effect on amphibian assemblages.


Allmon W. D. 1991. A plot study of forest floor litter frogs, Central Amazon, Brazil J Trop Ecol, 7: 503–522
Department of Local Administration. 2008. Check dam construction. Retrieved from http://www.thailocaladmin.go.th/work/e_book/eb1/stan12/p10.pdf 30/12/2008 (In Thai)
Duellman W. E., Trueb L. 1994. Biology of Amphibians. London: The Johns Hopkins Press, 670 pp
Dumrongrojwatthana P. 2004. Impacts of forest disturbance on soil organic matter, soil nutrients and carbon sequestration in Nam Wa Sub-watershed, Nan Province. M.Sc. Thesis. Chulalongkorn University, 191 pp
Gray D. H., Leiser A. T. 1982. Biotechnical slope protection and erosion control (1st Ed). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold. Cited in Solaimani K., Omidvar E., Kelarestaghi A. 2008. Investigation of check dam’s effects on channel morphology (Case study: Chehel Cheshme Watershed). Pak J Biol Sci, 11: 2083–2091
Heyer W. R., Donnelly M. A., McDiarmid R. W., Hayek L. C., Foster M. S. 1994. Measuring and monitoring biological diversity: Standard methods for amphibians. Washington D. C.: Smithsonian Institution Press, 364 pp
Inger R. F. 1966. The systematics and zoogeography of the amphibian of Borneo. Chicago: Field Museum of Natural History, 402 pp
Inger R. F., Stuebing R. B. 2005. A field guide to the frogs of Borneo (2nd Ed). Kota Kinabalu: Natural History Publications (Borneo), 201 pp
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2007. Climate change 2007: Synthesis report, contribution of working group I, II and III to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva: IPCC, 104 pp
Khonsue W. 1996. Species diversity and resource partitioning among amphibians at a stream in dry evergreen forest, Chachoengsao Wildlife Research Center. M.Sc. Thesis. Chulalongkorn University, 111 pp (In Thai)
McCune B., Mefford M. J. 1999. Multivariate analysis of ecological data, Version 4.25. Gleneden Beach, Oregon: MjM Software
Pechmann J. H. K., Scott D. E., Gibbons J. W., Semlitsch R. D. 1989. Influence of wetland hydroperiod on diversity and abundance of metamorphosing juvenile amphibians. Wetlands Ecol Manage, 1: 3–11
R Development Core Team. 2011. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. URL http://www.R-project.org
Shieh C., Guh Y., Wang S. 2007. The application of range of variability approach to the assessment of a check dam on riverine habitat alteration. Environ Geol, 52: 427–435
Shoemaker V. H., Hillman S. S., Hillyard S. D., Jackson D. C., McClanahan L. L., Withers P. C., Wygoda M. L. 1992. Exchange of water, ions, and respiratory gases in terrestrial amphibians. In Feder M. E., Burggren W. W. (Eds.), Environmental physiology of amphibians. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 646 pp
Snodgrass J. W., Komoroski M. J., Bryan Jr A. L., Burger J. 2000. Relationships among isolated wetland size, hydroperiod, and amphibian species richness: Implications for wetland regulations. Conserv Biol, 14: 414–419
Treepatanasuwan P., Ploychareon P. 2006. Plant community change in the check dam forestry area at Phu-Phan Royal Development Study Centre, Sakon Nakorn Province. Report of the Forest and Plant Conservation Research Division, Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation, Bangkok, Thailand
Walter H., Harnickell E., Mueller-Dombois D. 1975. Climate-diagram maps of the individual continents and the ecological climatic regions of the Earth. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 36 pp
Watershed Conservation and Management Office. 2008. Benefit of the check dam. Retrieved from http://www.dnp.go.th/Watershed/checkdam_site/cd_benefit3.htm 22/12/2008
Wells K. D. 2007. The ecology and behavior of amphibians. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 597 pp
Werner E. E., Skelly D. K., Relyea R. A., Yurewicz K. L. 2007. Amphibian species richness across environmental gradients. Oikos, 116: 1697–1712

更新日期/Last Update: 2016-03-15