[1].Keratinized Nuptial Spines Are Used for Male Combat in the Emei Moustache Toad (Leptobrachium boringii)[J].Asian Herpetological Research,2011,2(3):142-148.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1245.2011.00142]
 Cameron M. HUDSON,Xianjin HE and Jinzhong FU*.Keratinized Nuptial Spines Are Used for Male Combat in the Emei Moustache Toad (Leptobrachium boringii)[J].Asian Herpetological Research(AHR),2011,2(3):142-148.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1245.2011.00142]

Keratinized Nuptial Spines Are Used for Male Combat in the Emei Moustache Toad (Leptobrachium boringii)()

Asian Herpetological Research[ISSN:2095-0357/CN:51-1735/Q]

Original Article


Keratinized Nuptial Spines Are Used for Male Combat in the Emei Moustache Toad (Leptobrachium boringii)
Cameron M. HUDSON1 Xianjin HE2 and Jinzhong FU1*
1 Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada
2 College of Life Science and Technology, Southwest University for Nationalities, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China
reproductive behaviour territoriality Leptobrachium boringii secondary sexual characters
We describe the natural history and reproductive behaviour of the Emei Moustache Toad (Leptobrachium boringii) with an emphasis on the development of keratinized nuptial spines in males and document combat behaviour for the first time in this species. Between February and March of 2011, 19 female and 43 male L. boringii from Mount Emei UNESCO World Heritage Site, Sichuan, China were observed throughout the breeding season. This species exhibits male-biased sexual size dimorphism (SSD) with limited evidence of paternal care (nest guarding by males). Prior to the breeding season males grow 10 – 16 keratinized spines on their upper lip, which fall off once the season has ended. Throughout the breeding season males construct and defend aquatic nests where they produce advertisement calls to attract females. During this time we documented 14 cases involving a total of 22 males where males used their moustaches for aggressive interaction. Combat typically occurred at the beginning of the season when males would compete for a limited number of available nest sites. Neither male body size, nor body condition significantly affects the outcome of an aggressive interaction, suggesting that size may not be the only factor influencing an individual’s chance of victory. Our evidence for male competition and aggression, along with observed paternal care are potential mechanisms to explain the evolution of male-biased SSD observed in this species.


Andersson M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press
Balinsky B. I., Balinsky J. B. 1954. On the breeding habits of the South African Bullfrog, Pyxicephalus adsepersus. S Afr J Sci, 51: 55–58
Breder C. M., Rosen D. E. 1966. Modes of reproduction in fishes. New York: Natural History Press, 609-613
Clutton-Brock T. H., Albon S. D., Gibson R. M., Guiness F. E. 1979. The logical stag: Adaptive aspects of fighting in red deer (Cervus elaphus L.). Anim Behav, 27: 211–225
Clutton-Brock T. H. 1982. The functions of Antlers. Behaviour, 79: 108–125
Darwin C. 1871. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: Murray
Davison G. W. H. 1985. Avian spurs. J Zool London, 206: 353–366
Duellman W. E., Savitsky, A. H. 1976. Aggressive behaviour in a centrolenid frog with comments on territoriality in anurans. Herpetologica, 32:401–404
Eberhard W. G. 1979. The function of horns in Podischnus agenor (Dynastinae) and other beetles. In Blum M. S., Blum N. A. (Eds), Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects. New York: Academic Press, 231–258
Eberhard W. G. 1980. Horned beetles. Sci Amer, 242: 166–182
Geist V. 1966. The evolution of horn-like organs. Behaviour, 27: 125–214
Holberton R. L., Hanano R., Able K. P. 1990. Age related dominance in dark-eyed juncos: Effects of plumage colour and prior residence. Anim Behav, 40: 573–579
Ho T. C., Lathrop A., Murphy R. W., Orlov N. L. 1999. A redescription of Vibrissaphora ailaonica with a new record in Vietnam. Russ J Herpetol, 6: 48-54
Hsu Y., Earley R. L., Wolf L. L. 2006. Modulation of aggressive behaviour by fighting experience: Mechanisms and contest outcomes. Biol Rev, 81: 33–74
Jarman P. J. 1989. On being thick skinned: Dermal shields in large mammalian herbivores. Biol J Linn Soc, 36: 169–191
Liu C., Hu, S. 1961. Tailless Amphibians of China. Beijing: Science Press
Lutz B. 1960. Fighting and an incipient notion of territory in male treefrogs. Copeia, 1960: 61–63
Katsikaros K., Shine R. 1997. Sexual dimorphism in the tusked frog, Adelotus brevis (Anura: Myobatrachidae): The roles of natural and sexual selection. Biol J Linn Soc, 60: 39–51
Kemp D. J., Wiklund C. 2004. Residency effects in animal contests. Proc R Soc Lond B, 271: 1707–1711
Kluge A. G. 1981. The life history, social organization, and parental behaviour of Hylarosenbergi Boulenger, a nest-building gladiator frog. Miscellaneous Publications Museum of Zoology University of Michigan, 160: 1–170
McDiarmid R. W., Adler K. 1974. Notes on territorial and vocal behavior of Neotropical frogs of the genus Centrolenella. Herpetologica, 30: 75–78
Mesterton-Gibbons M., Dugatkin L. A. 1995. Towards a theory of dominance hierarchies: Effects of assessment, group size and variation in fighting ability. Behav Ecol, 6: 416–423
Moretz J. A. 2003. Aggression and RHP in the northern swordtail fish, Xiphosurus cortezi: The relationship between size and contest dynamics in male-male competition. Ethology, 109: 995–1008
Ohler A., Teynié A., David P. 2004. A green-eyed Leptobrachium (Anura: Megophryidae) from southern Laos. Raffles B Zool, 52: 695–700
Ryan M. J. 1988. Energy, calling and selection. Amer Zool, 28: 885–98
Shine R. 1979. Sexual selection and sexual dimorphism in the Amphibia. Copeia, 2: 297–306
Silverman H. B., Dunbar M. J. 1980. Aggressive tusk use by the narwhal (Monodon monoceros L). Nature, 284: 57–58
Smith J. M. 1977. Parental investment: A prospective analysis. Anim Behav, 25: 1–9
Stamps J. A., Krishnan V. V. 1994. Territory acquisition in lizards: I. First encounters. Anim Behav, 47: 1375–1385
Stuart-Fox D. M., Johnston G. R. 2005. Experience overrides colour in lizard contests. Behaviour, 142: 329–350
Temeles E. J. 1994. The role of neighbours in territorial systems: When are they dear ‘enemies’? Anim Behav, 47: 339–350
Tsuji H., Matsui M. 2002. Male-male combat and head morphology in a fanged frog (Rana kuhlii) from Taiwan. J Herpatol, 36: 520–526
Wells K. D. 2007. The Ecology and Behaviour of Amphibians. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Ye C., Fei L., Hu S. 1993. Rare and Economic Amphibians of China. Chengdu: Sichuan Publishing House of Science and Technology
Zheng Y., Fu J. 2007. Making a doughnut-shaped egg mass: Oviposition behaviour of Vibrissaphora boringiae (Anura: Megophryidae). Amphibia-Reptilia, 28: 309–311
Zheng Y., Li S., Fu J. 2008. A phylogenetic analysis of the frog genera Vibrissaphora and Leptobrachium, and the correlated evolution of nuptial spine and reversed sexual size dimorphism. Mol Phylogenet Evol, 46: 695–707
Zheng Y., Deng D., Li S., Fu J. 2010. Aspects of the breeding biology of the Omei mustache toad (Leptobrachium boringii): Polygamy and paternal care. Amphibia–Reptilia, 31: 183-194

更新日期/Last Update: 2016-03-15