Victor Mendes LIPINSKI,André Passaglia SCHUCH and Tiago Gomes dos SANTOS.Changes on Anuran Tadpole Functional Diversity along an Environmental Gradient at the Southernmost Atlantic Rainforest Remnant[J].Asian Herpetological Research(AHR),2020,11(1):63-70.[doi:10.16373/j.cnki.ahr.190039]
Click Copy

Changes on Anuran Tadpole Functional Diversity along an Environmental Gradient at the Southernmost Atlantic Rainforest Remnant
Share To:

Asian Herpetological Research[ISSN:2095-0357/CN:51-1735/Q]

2020 VoI.11 No.1
Research Field:
Publishing date:


Changes on Anuran Tadpole Functional Diversity along an Environmental Gradient at the Southernmost Atlantic Rainforest Remnant
Victor Mendes LIPINSKI1* André Passaglia SCHUCH13 and Tiago Gomes dos SANTOS12
1 Post Graduation Program of Animal Biodiversity, Federal University of Santa Maria, Laboratory of Herpetology, Department of Biology, Av. Roraima n 1000, building 17, room 1140, Camobi, 97105-900, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil
2 Universidade Federal do Pampa, Av. Antonio Trilha, 1847, Centro, 97300-000, Sao Gabriel, RS, Brasil
3 Southern Regional Space Research Center, CRS/INPE-MCTI, P.O. Box 5021, room 1041, 97110-970, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil
Anuran ecosystem function conservation unities tadpoles
For decades the ecologists are using the same methods in order to determine the environmental health of a community, however, the crescent need on defining how these processes act, triggered the development of new methods that could classify the organisms and their function at the habitats. Here we used the anuran larvae to understand the effects of an environmental gradient on the structure and organization of the anuran assemblages along it, and to access in a realistic form, the actual state of preservation of the largest remnant of Atlantic Rainforest on the Southernmost portion of Brazil. We found that despite the higher diversity of species and the conservation unit status of the place, the ecosystem itself is still in danger, given the low number of functional groups and thus a higher number of ecosystem services that can be lost.


Altig R., McDiarmid R. W. 1999. Body Plan: Development and Morphology. In: Tadpoles: McDiarmid RW and Altig R (Eds),The biology of Anuran Larvae, University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, p. 24–51
Barrett K., Guyer C., Samoray S. T., Kanno Y. 2016. Stream and Riparian Habitat Use by Anurans along a Forested Gradient in Western Georgia, USA. Copeia, 104(2): 570–576
Cadotte M. W., Carscadden K., Mirotchnick N. 2011. Beyond species: Functional diversity and the maintenance of ecological processes and services, 45 (5): 1079–1087
Cianciaruso M. V., Silva I. A., Batalha M. A. 2009. Diversidades filogenética e funcional: novas abordagens para a Ecologia de comunidades. Biota Neotrop, 9(3): 93–103
Connell J. H. 1978. Diversity in Tropical Rain Forests and Coral Reefs. Science, 199(4335): 1302–1310
Cornwell W. K., Schwilk D. W., Ackerly D. D. 2006. A trait-based test for habitat filtering: Convex hull volume. Ecology, 87(6): 1465–1471
Cronin J. T., Travis J. 1986. Size-Limited Predation on Larval Rana areolata (Anura: Ranidae) by Two Species of Backswimmer (Insecta: Hemiptera: Notonectidae). Herpetologica, 42(2): 171–174
Diamond J. M. 1975. Assembly of species communities. In: Diamond MLC. and JM, (Eds), Ecology and Evolution of Communities. Massachusetts, Harvard University Press, Massachusetts, USA. p. 342–444
Díaz S., Cabido M. 2001. Vive la différence: Plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes.16(11): 646–655
Elton C. S. 1958. The Ecology of invasions of animals and plants. In: Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. University of Chicago Press 196pp
Fonseca C. R., Ganade G. 2001. Species functional redundancy, random extinctions and the stability of ecosystems. J Ecol, 89(1): 118–125
Geber M. A., Griffen L. R. 2003. Inheritance and Natural Selection on Functional Traits. Int J Plant Sci, 164(S3): S21–S42
Haddad C. F. B., Prado C. P. A. 2005. Reproductive Modes in Frogs and Their Unexpected Diversity in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. Bioscience, 55(3): 207
Hutchinson G. E. 1957. Concluding remarks on the cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 22: 415–427
Johnson J. B., Saenz D., Adams C. K., Hibbitts T. J. 2015. Naturally occurring variation in tadpole morphology and performance linked to predator regime. Ecol Evol, 5(15): 2991–3002
Kirkman L. K., Mitchell R. J, Helton R. C., Drew M. B. 2001. Productivity and species richness across an environmental gradient in a fire-dependent ecosystem. Am J Bot, 88(11): 2119–2128
Laliberté E., Legendre P. 2010. A distance-based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits. Ecology, 91(1): 299–305
McGill B. J., Enquist B. J., Weiher E., Westoby M. 2006. Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21(4): 178–185
Morin P. J. 2011. Community ecology, 2nd ed. Wiley-Blackwell, New Brunswick, New Jersey
Nomura F., do Prado V. H. M., da Silva F. R., Borges R. E., Dias N. Y. N, Rossa-Feres D. C. 2011. Are you experienced? Predator type and predator experience trade-offs in relation to tadpole mortality rates. J Zool, 284(2): 144–150
Nord M., Forslund P. 2015. Environmental Gradients Explain Species Richness and Community Composition of Coastal Breeding Birds in the Baltic Sea. PLoS One, 10(2): e0118455
Pearman P. B. 1995. Effects of pond size and consequent predator density on two species of tadpoles. Oecologia, 102(1): 1–8
Petchey O. L. 2003. Integrating methods that investigate how complementarity influences ecosystem functioning. Oikos, 101(2): 323–330
Petchey O. L., Gaston K. J. 2002a. Functional diversity (FD), species richness and community composition. Ecol Lett, 5(3): 402–411
Petchey O. L., Gaston K. J. 2002b. Extinction and the loss of functional diversity. Proc Biol Sci, 269(1501): 1721–1727
Petchey O. L., Gaston K. J. 2006. Functional diversity: Back to basics and looking forward. Ecol Lett, 9: 741–758
Petchey O. L., O’Gorman E. J., Flynn D. F. B. 2009. A functional guide to functional diversity measures. In: Naeem S, Bunker DE, Hector A, Loreau M and Perrings C (Eds), Biodiversity, Ecosystem Functioning and Human Wellbeing: An Ecological and Economic Perspective, Oxford University Press, Oxford, p.365
Prado D. E. 2000. Seasonally dry forests of tropical South America: From forgotten ecossystems to a new phytogeographic unit. Edinburgh J Bot, 57: 437–461
Prado V. H. M., Rossa-Feres D. C. 2014. Multiple Determinants of Anuran Richness and Occurrence in an Agricultural Region in South-Eastern Brazil. Environ Manage, 53(4): 823–837
R Development Core Team R. 2011. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing
Rojas-Ahumada D. P., Landeiro V. L., Menin M. 2012. Role of environmental and spatial processes in structuring anuran communities across a tropical rain forest. Austral Ecol, 37: 865–873
Root R. B. 1967. The Niche Exploitation Pattern of the Blue-Gray Gnatcatcher. Ecol Monogr, 37(4): 317–350
Rosenfeld J. S. 2002. Functional redundancy in ecology and conservation. Oikos, 98(1): 156–162
Schmid-Hempel P. 1991. Searching behaviour: The behavioural ecology of finding resources. Trends Ecol Evol, 6(11): 370–371
Southwood T. R. E. 1977. Habitat, the Templet for Ecological Strategies? J. Anim Ecol, 46(2): 336
de Souza Queiroz C., da Silva F. R., Rossa-Feres D. C. 2015. The relationship between pond habitat depth and functional tadpole diversity in an agricultural landscape. R Soc Open Sci, 2(7): 150–165
Strauss A., Reeve E., Randrianiaina R. D., Vences M., Glos J. 2010. The world’s richest tadpole communities show functional redundancy and low functional diversity: ecological data on Madagascar’s stream-dwelling amphibian larvae. BMC Ecol, 10: 12
Tellería J. L. 2016. Wildlife Habitat Requirements: Concepts and Research Approaches. In: Mateo R, Arroyo B and Garcia JT, Current Trends in Wildlife Research, Springer International Publishing, p. 79–95
Tilman D. 2001. Functional Diversity. In: Encyclopedia of Biodiversity, Volume 3. Academic Press, San Diego, S.A. Levin. USA, California. p. 109–120
Tscharntke T., Tylianakis J. M., Rand T. A., Didham R. K., Fahrig L., Batary P., Bengtssons J., Clough Y., Crist T. O., Dormann C. F., Ewers R. M., Frund J., Holt R. D., Holzschuh A., Klein A. M., Kleijn D., Kremen C., Landis D. A., Laurance W., Lindenmayer D., Scherber C., Sodhi N., Steffan-Dewenter I., Thies C., van der Putten W. H., Westphal C. 2012. Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes-eight hypotheses. Biol Rev, 87(3):661–685
Urban M. C., Leibold M. A., Amarasekare P., De Meester L., Gomulkiewicz R., Hochberg M. E., Klausmeier C. A., Loeuille N., de Mazancourt C., Norberg J., Pantel J. H., Strauss S. Y., Vellend M., Wade M. J. 2008. The evolutionary ecology of metacommunities. Trends Ecol Evol, 23(6): 311–317
Violle C., Navas M. L., Vile D., Kazakou E., Fortunel C., Hummel I., Garnier E. 2007. Let the concept of trait be functional! Oikos, 116(5): 882–892
Walker B. 1995. Conserving biological diversity through ecosystem resilience. Conserv Biol, 9(4): 747–752
Wellborn G., Skelly D. K., Werner E. E., Welborn G. A., Skelly D. K., Werner E. E. 1996. Mechanisms creating community structure across a freshwater habitat gradient. Annu Rev Ecol Syst, 27: 337–363
Werner E. E., Skelly D. K., Relyea R. A. , Yurewicz K. L. 2007. Amphibian species richness across environmental gradients. Oikos, 116(10): 1697–1712
Woodward F. I., Cramer W. 1996. Plant functional types and climatic change: Introduction. J Veg Sci, 7(3): 306–308


Last Update: 2020-03-27